May 3, 2008
We continue to make progress with our best year ever with 3669 votes.
All this is without the national TV, radio and newspaper coverage that the Lib/Lab/Cons receive.
Derby Ward 2nd place 763 votes 37.94%
Percentage increase in votes since 2007 result: 39%
Litherland Ward 2nd place 458 votes 24.93%
Percentage increase in votes since 2007 result: 119%
Linacre Ward 2nd place 219 votes 13.22%
First time candidate
Netherton & Orrell Ward 2nd place 567 votes 15.45%
Not applicable, these results are for 2 candidates.
Molyneux Ward 3rd place 514 votes 17.79%
Percentage increase in votes since 2007 result: 51%
Ford Ward 4th place 265 votes 12.11%
Percentage increase in votes since 2007 result: 123%
Church Ward 4th place 315 votes 12.74%
Percentage increase in votes since 2007 result: 51%
Victoria Ward 4th place 205 votes 5.61%
Percentage increase in votes since 2007 result: -3%%
Sudell Ward 4th place 306 votes 9.92%
Percentage increase in votes since 2007 result: 122%
St Oswald Ward 5th place 57 votes 2.90%
First time candidate
April 6, 2008
May 1st 2008, local elections – 11 of our candidates will contend 10 wards. This will include our first campaign in both Linacre and St. Oswald wards and we will contend the two vacancies in Netherton and Orrell ward.
South Sefton constituency
Derby Paul Nuttall
Litherland David Bryant
Ford Philip Wordley
Victoria Michael Kelly
Church Joseph Nugent
Netherton & Orrell Pat Gaskell
Netherton & Orrell Andrew Dobson
St Oswald David Jones
Linacre Robin-Michael Thompson
Sefton Central constituency
Molyneux Peter Harper
Sudell Linda Harper
We also have several candidates standing in the Southport constituency.
All in all we are expanding our area of interest. If you agree with our policies – and most people do – then VOTE UKIP and change life for the better in your area. People can clearly see that UKIP is emerging as the real voice of opposition in British politics, both locally and nationally.
March 25, 2008
CLAIRE CURTIS-THOMAS voted FOR the EU Reform Treaty on 21st Jan.2008.
On March 5th 2008, she voted AGAINST having a referendum on the EU Reform Treaty. In so doing, she broke the promise on which she was elected by her constituents.
JOE BENTON voted FOR the EU Reform Treaty on 21st Jan.2008.
On March 5th 2008, he voted AGAINST having a referendum on the EU Reform Treaty. In so doing, he broke the promise on which he was elected by his constituents.
On March 19th 2008-03-25 JOE BENTON and CLAIRE CURTIS-THOMAS both failed to vote for a suspension of Post Office closures, both choosing to abstain.
* Post Office closures result from the 1997 EU directive 97/67/EC, which was designed to break up state monopolies such as Royal Mail.
* Labour MPs Joe Benton and Claire Curtis-Thomas both claim they are trying to save local Post Offices from closure.
Are they helping their constituents, or just pleasing New Labour Prime Minister, Gordon Brown? I am amazed that our elected representatives continue to treat us with such total contempt. This was the perfect opportunity for both MPs to prove that they really do want to keep local Post Offices open. Instead, they have betrayed our trust in them.
Joe Nugent, Chairman, UKIP South Sefton
The following article was submitted by the Sefton Branch of the UK Independence Party (UKIP) for publication in the 27th March 2008 edition of the Star newspaper (principally the Maghull and Aintree Star), but was not published in that week’s edition. UKIP will continue pressure on the Star to get this important latest exposure of gross dishonesty by the Liberal Democrats published. It is a response to the front-page Maghull and Aintree Star story of 6th March, 2008, and is an updated version of a mail which was sent to the Star on 10th March - but which was not published in either that or the following week’s edition.
———————————–
Local Liberal-Democrat Councillors have left themselves open to claims of gross dishonesty after criticising British Waterways in an apparent attempt to increase their election-prospects. Local Lib-Dem Council Leader Tony Robertson and Lib-Dem Councillor Geoff Howe were pictured on the front page of the 6th March edition of the Maghull and Aintree Star picking up cans from the tow-path alongside the Leeds-Liverpool canal near Melling Road, Aintree. They claimed that they did so after British Waterways ignored their pleas to clean up the area. But Peter Harper, the UK Independence Party’s candidate for Molyneux ward and prospective Parliamentary Candidate for Sefton Central, has good grounds to suspect that the Star was deliberately deceived by the Lib-Dems.
Mr Harper - who is standing against Councillor Howe in the Local Elections in May - had written to British Waterways about the rubbish problem in early February and British Waterways had promised a clean-up, which they had informed Mr. Harper would take place on Friday 14th March - just one week after the Liberal-Democrats would later publicise claims of a nil-response from British Waterways.
Further to this, Mr. Harper, having read the Lib-Dems’ clean-up story, contacted British Waterways to check if the Lib-Dems had even contacted them about the litter problem: he was told that one of the Lib-Dem Councillors had attended a meeting with British Waterways management a week before the newspaper article was published, at which the Councillor was made fully aware of British Waterways’ plan to perform the clean-up in a fortnight’s time.
“When I read the story about the Lib-Dems getting no response from British Waterways, it seemed obvious to me that they had either not contacted British Waterways at all or that they were acting in a deliberately dishonest manner in order to improve Councillor Howe’s election-prospects in the coming May elections,” said Mr Harper. “At first, I wasn’t sure if this was just the latest case of Lib-Dem dishonesty or incompetence, or both.” “I have always found British Waterways to be responsive whenever I have made requests for litter collections, including the removal of trolleys from the canal,” he added.
Mr. Harper said: “I wonder: do people think that the introduction by our Lib-Dem Councillors of fortnightly bin-collections will reduce fly-tipping, rubbish being dumped, etc? I - along with the entire membership of the UK Independence Party - am firmly of the opinion that it will not. We want to see increased recycling schemes run in tandem with a reinstatement of weekly bin-collections.”
Mr Harper went on to claim, in relation to the bogus litter-collection story: “This is typical of the Lib Dems, who seem to spend more time fabricating news-stories and trying to associate themselves with the good work of others than actually taking positive actions of their own.”
March 7, 2008
Dear Joe
I have a number of questions that I would like you to answer: -
Last night, you voted against both Conservative and Labour amendments which could have allowed for a referendum to take place on the EU Lisbon Treaty. As one of your constituents I would like to know why you voted in this way. I would also like to know why you voted in favour of the Treaty on 21 January. Could you enlighten me as to the benefits this treaty will bring to the UK?
As you already know, I am not one of your average constituents with limited knowledge of this issue: I work as a Political Advisor to the Independence and Democracy Group in the European Parliament and it is my job to understand this treaty inside and out. I would like to know whether you have read the full text of the Lisbon Treaty. It is a large document in itself, but it is impossible to understand unless you have two further documents to cross reference and one of them - the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union - is almost impossible to find. So, if you have not read the Treaty - which I suspect 99% of MPs (as well as MEPs) have not - then allow me to enlighten you as to its contents:
Official analysis of this treaty by Jens Peter Bonde has shown that the Lisbon Treaty and the EU Constitution are over 90% the same. For example, the EU Constitution would have granted the EU 105 new powers and so does the new Lisbon Treaty. The only difference is that out go the EU symbols and in come competence over Climate Change. The other 104 remain the same. Moreover, in the rejected Constitution, Qualified Majority Voting would have replaced Unanimity in 62 areas. This is increased to 63 in the Lisbon Treaty, so in some ways it is even worse! The only difference is that out go Intellectual Property Rights and in come Energy and Climate Change. The other 60 remain the same. Indeed, Valery Giscard d’Estaing, the author of the rejected EU Constitution, admitted that there were only “cosmetic changes” which would make the new Lisbon Treaty “easier to swallow.” Both Nicholas Sarkozy and Angela Merkel have also admitted that the Constitution and the Lisbon Treaty are almost one and the same.
Finally, in 2005 we fought a General Election in which you were pledged to support a referendum on the EU Constitution. So, given that the two documents are virtually identical, do you not feel that you broke your promise to the people of Bootle last night? If you do not believe that the two documents are the same, then please could you inform me as to how they are different?
Yours sincerely, Paul Nuttall
February 28, 2008
I WOULD like to congratulate Merseyside Labour MPs Frank Field and Bob Wareing for voting against the EU Reform Treaty in Westminster on Tuesday.
They did so against the wish of the Labour Party leadership and showed courage in their convictions. The same, however, cannot be said about Merseyside’s other Labour MPs, who all voted in favour of the EU Reform Treaty. This document considerably increases the power of the EU, while weakening British sovereignty. It creates an EU president, an EU foreign minister and hands power in 60 areas over to the unelected EU Commission.
Most importantly, it gives the EU a legal personality, which means it can now sign treaties on behalf of the British people. This treaty significantly alters Britain’s relationship with the EU and should be put to a referendum, just as the Labour Party promised in its 2005 Manifesto.
Paul Nuttall, UK Independence Party prospective Parliamentary candidate for Bootle
February 12, 2008
Just click on: http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/eu-reform-treaty.html
The UK Independence Party’s Bootle Parliamentary Candidate, Paul Nuttall is telling the people of Bootle “House of Commons, 21st January 2008: Labour MP’s, Joe Benton and Claire Cutis-Thomas voted FOR the EU Reform Treaty. UKIP say this is a disgrace!”
The Labour government promised the nation a referendum on the EU constitution and now they intend to go ahead and ratify the Reform Treaty without giving the people that referendum.
We need to wake up and reject this Euro take-over before we lose our national identity altogether!
On Thursday 31 January 2008, a report by Liberal Democrat MEP Fiona Hall urged the EU Commission to phase out patio heaters in the near future. The Commission is more than willing to take up this challenge and has indicated that they will be banned by 2010. The UK Independence Party’s Bootle Parliamentary Candidate, Paul Nuttall, said: “The EU now wants to know what we have in our back gardens. It is intrusive and an affront to civil liberty.”
He continued: “It is also complete madness. The smoking ban came into force last year, so pub landlords were forced to buy patio heaters so that smokers could have a cigarette outside. Now the EU has gone and banned them. It is obvious that the right hand doesn’t know what the left is doing.”
February 6, 2008
Here we go again: more EU Legislation hurts the people of my constituency (Bootle). If it isn’t Post Office closures, it’s fortnightly bin collections, and now we have the closure of the Rolls Royce factory in Netherton. The North West Development Agency, which receives huge chunks of EU cash, has said that although it was in negotiation with Rolls Royce, it could not simply hand out subsidies to ensure that the factory stayed in Netherton. Why? Because this would have broken EU Competition Law. If the British Government or the NWDA wants to provide Rolls Royce with subsidies or incentives to stay in Netherton, then they should have the right to do so. However, the only way to do this is to stop harmful EU legislation being imposed on the British people - and the only way to put a stop to that is by leaving the EU.
Paul Nuttall (Bootle UK Independence Party Parliamentary Candidate)
50 Radnor Drive Bootle L20 9JJ
Tel. 07976 700086 ukipbootle@yahoo.co.uk
December 17, 2007
Tell the Truth Mr. Benton Paul Nuttall, the UK Independence Party Parliamentary Candidate for Bootle, challenged MP Joe Benton to come clean on the recent announcement that Aintree Road Post Office is set for closure. Paul’s challenge was published in this weeks Bootle Times.
Mr. Nuttall, who is a Political Advisor in the European Parliament and also a local resident, stated that “Mr. Benton claims he is fighting to save our post office by setting up petitions and talking to local people. But I am sure he is not telling them the real reason our beloved post office is closing.” In 1997, Labour Party MEPs voted for EU Directive 97/67/EC, which was designed to break up state monopolies, including the Royal Mail. The directive also forced a cut in state subsidies which has forced post office closures all over Britain.
Mr. Nuttall concluded: “I think it is a bit rich that Joe Benton is now trying to paint himself as the possible saviour of the Aintree Road Post Office. Do not forget that his party’s MEPs voted for an EU Directive that has forced over 3500 post office closures since 1997. Unfortunately, it will probably claim Aintree Road Post Office as its next victim”
— Next Page »
|